Does Your Commune Matter To You?

The Parti Socialiste – in collaboration with sister parties – has produced a new leaflet (click here to download the PDF) on the communal elections in Belgium. These elections will take place on 14 October 2012, and all EU citizens can register to exercise their right to vote.

Download the leaflet to find out why it is important to vote in the communal elections and please share the leaflet with your friends.

Christmas Pub Quiz 2011

The Brussels Labour Christmas Pub Quiz 2011 will be held on Wednesday 7 December at The Staff, Rue de Trèves 42, 1050 Ixelles.

Please arrive at 19:30 for the quiz, which will be compèred by Brussels Labour’s own David Earnshaw.

To register a team of four people, please email the Secretary with the name of your team and the team members and make a transfer of €20 to the Brussels Labour account: 001-1128765-52

Please include in your bank transfer your team name & indicate that it is for the quiz.

A raffle will also be held for charity, with proceeds going to the Red Cross for famine relief in the Horn of Africa.

Details are available in the Brussels Labour calendar.

Next branch meeting: Clive Betts MP

The next Brussels Labour branch meeting takes place this week:

 

Wednesday 23 November

Clive Betts MP – Chair, Communities and Local Government Select Committee

‘Localism and the Big Society – Labour’s response

L’Horloge du Sud, Rue du Trône 141, 1050 Ixelles

19:30: Venue open – If you would like to eat, please come early and order before the meeting
starts

20:00: Start of meeting

 

 


View Larger Map

 

Forthcoming meetings include:

Monday 5 December

Claude Moraes MEP and Hackney North & Stoke Newington CLP 

have invited Brussels Labour members to meet the CLP members during their visit to Brussels

The Staff, Rue de Trèves 42, 1050 Ixelles
From 19:00
 

Wednesday 7 December

Brussels Labour Christmas Pub Quiz

with quizmaster David Earnshaw

The Staff, Rue de Trèves 42, 1050 Ixelles
Further details tbc
 

Wednesday 25 January 2012

Branch meeting

Further details tbc

Guest blog from Julian Priestley: ‘A treaty change is not a panacea’

For certain media commentators, self-appointed spokespersons for the market, our friends outside the EU and some ministers in some EU governments who should know better, the debt crisis currently engulfing the eurozone has an easy solution. The European Central Bank should just step up to the plate and guarantee the solvency of the euroland member states.

In this black-and-white version of the world, Germany is the obstacle, haunted by its fears of returning to the hyperinflation of the early 1920s when its national bank just printed those much-photographed cartloads of million deutschmark notes. As the situation deteriorates from difficult to dangerous, the blame game has intensified.

And the culprits are now supposed to be found in the shadowy Frankfurt Group, a sinister secret society whose members happen to be the German Chancellor, the French President (i.e. the democratically elected heads of government of the two largest euroland countries) the President of the ECB, the Presidents of the European Council, the Commission and the Eurogroup, with the occasional participation of the head of the IMF and the Commissioner responsible for economic and monetary policy.

In the current hysteria this ‘Gang of Eight’ is assuming the reins of power in Europe, overthrowing democratic governments and parachuting technocrats in their place (worse still technocrats with European experience) , and imposing the fiat of Brussels in the 17 euro countries. Cooler heads might recognise the value in having regular consultations throughout this crisis with a manageable number of people who will in the end have to propose the solutions; and that this is a sensible if partial response to the much criticised leadership vacuum which has bedevilled the crisis.

And those solutions are not so straightforward. First, conferring on the ECB the role of ‘lender of last resort’ for the Eurozone would almost certainly require a Treaty change; anything less would be challenged in the courts, particularly in Germany. It is true that Germany has a federal structure, a multiparty coalition and an assertive judiciary which makes it impossible for any leader to push through proposals which would not only be politically controversial but also legally questionable.

And it would not just be Germany which would shudder at the thought of an open-ended commitment to other euro countries, now that the costs of servicing their debts have spiralled. So they would seek guarantees that would be tantamount to euro countries losing at least some theoretical national control over domestic spending.

And for this to have credibility it would need the same legal sanctity as that which would authorise the ECB’s new role, namely a Treaty change.

There are some who would relish the thought of a new constitutional process for the EU; certain federalists would see this as the defining moment, to complete business unfinished at Maastricht, Nice, Amsterdam or Lisbon ; others, such as the Council’s former top lawyer, Jean-Claude Piris would want a new Treaty to consecrate the schism between the ins and the outs, a hardcore of the 17 virtuous with the other 10 banished formally to the margins; yet others, like at least some in the main party in the UK coalition would want to seize a chance gifted by heaven to repatriate labour legislation powers and other social dispositions back to member states, or at least to organise new opt-outs.

And these are what are already being talked about; who knows what inventiveness will be shown, and what shopping-lists will be drawn up, once the starting pistol is fired on Treaty change? Continue reading Guest blog from Julian Priestley: ‘A treaty change is not a panacea’